Product Description

"Politics" tells the story of a father and daughter. It also tells the story of a menage a trois. "Politics" explores crucial domestic problems of sexual etiquette. What should sleeping arrangements be in a menage a trois? Is it polite to read while two people have sex beside you? Is it permissible to be jealous? If you have eczema, may you complain that undinism can be painful? "Politics" is a comedy about kindness. And, at the same time, it is also about Milan Kundera, blow jobs, Chairman Mao's personal hygiene, Vaclav Havel, half-Jewishness, Bollywood, shopping, Hitler's sexual fetish, selfishness, Osip Mandelstam, premature ejaculation, the late Queen Mother, thrush, Stalin on the phone, politeness, pink fluffy handcuffs, and Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony. "Politics" is not about politics.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #243647 in Books
• Published on: 2004-07-01
• Original language: English
• Binding: Paperback
• 288 pages

The Scotsman, August 16, 2003
'It is the gentlest, most beguiling book I have read so far this year...'

Time Out London, August 20, 2003
'..allusive, barbed, cocky, flamboyant, reckless, obscene and very funny..'

The Independent, August 23, 2003
''Politics' has a flexibility and muscle that elevates him above most debut novelists...It deserves your immediate attention.'

Customer Reviews

Underrated
I was interested to read Politics from when I heard that Adam Thirlwell was a fan of Milan Kundera and his Art of the Novel. I had also heard him accused of trying to emulate Kundera's style and failing, and I had heard that Politics was not a particularly good book.

It is all too easy, however, to make comparisons with Kundera. Like him, Thirlwell divides his chapters into short, numbered sections, and he also adopts a definite authorial voice. However, it should be clear that he has not followed The Art of the Novel word for word, as his style is definitely his own.

Perhaps the authorial voice is one place where he is accused of failing to imitate Kundera. I disagree with such accusations: Thirlwell's voice is less subtle than Kundera's, and worse off for it, but he doesn't appear to be trying to sound like anyone else. This voice however is at times annoying and patronising. "I think you are going to like Moshe." he says, introducing a character on the first page. "His girlfriend's name was Nana. I think you will like her too."

It would be wrong to forbid an author from liking his own characters, no matter what they do in the book, but in trying to force his opinion on his readers, Thirlwell somewhat defeats the object of creative writing. It is interesting to have authorial insight at times, such as when he directly explains why he has made a character do a certain thing, but it does make it difficult to form a personal interpretation, and this could come across as very off-putting.

Thirlwell's use of characters is also similar to Kundera's, with both authors taking a theme, using it as the title of a novel, and describing how it affects the characters. However, Thirlwell's principals are more closely linked than most of Kundera's, through the ménage à trois which is the subject of Politics.

Somewhat confusingly, the appalling blurb claims that "Politics is not about politics." prompting me to wonder why, in that case, Thirlwell decided it was a fitting title for his book. To my mind, the novel is about social and sexual politics, and as such may have benefited from having a wider array of characters to act out the various scenarios.

However, it works well as it is, and it is an exploration of the possibly unasked question "How do you end a ménage à trois?" The anecdotal style may not appeal to everyone, but I enjoyed it, and despite the off-putting beginning I did come to like the characters, whose humanity was visible through their often thoughtless façades.

Politics is not an average novel, and as such may seem disconcerting, and is probably not to everyone's taste, but it is worth reading, and for all its uncomfortable foibles, I found it strangely compelling. Adam Thirlwell is not a low-fat version of Milan Kundera, but he never purports to be, and I admired his book for his own style. Politics is a very good first novel, and Thirlwell shows the potential to one day write one which, while being wholly distinct from, may be as great as The Unbearable Lightness of Being.

Kundera-Lite
Although Politics recieved mainly lukewarm revuews from some of the critics, this can be explaned by the OTT hype produced by Thirwell having been included ion the list of Grant's Best Young British Novelists earlier this year, despite him not having actually published anything!

The story centres on the sexual relationships of the three main protangonists, as the synopsis above explains. Thirwell also veers off into monologues about the sexual life of Mao, "telephone Stalinism", Hitler's sexual fetishes, sexual etiquette and much more besides. As such, the book owes an obvious debt to Kundera, who Thirwell approvingly mentions several times.

Only one slight criticism: Whether a post-structuralist rebuttal of the postmodernist idea of the 'Death of the Author', the narrative voice is rather dominant - i.e. - Thirwell often interjects to tell you what and what not to think, as evidenced in the first line. This, combined with his habit of using short, often child-like sentences and slightly patronising tone (at times) can become a little annoying.

But besides from this, over all Politics is a comic book, a funny, light-hearted book that is well worth reading.

Great novel - funny, tender, clever and easy to read
This novel ought to be easy to dislike - Thirlwell is young, talented, on the Granta list at the tender age of 24, and has profiles popping up all over the place. But it's very difficult, if not impossible, to resist this charming, witty and very wise first novel.

The plot is simple and effective - three London twentysomethings fall into a menage a trois, which is explored in all its messy and muddling detail. The characters are convincing and touchingly vulnerable and neurotic - it is enderaring and painful to watch them try to negotiate the confusing sexual situation that they have become entangled in.

One of the novel's greatest strengths are its observations about contemporary relationships. Many readers will enjoy the pleasurable surprise of recognising their own thoughts and experiences in those of the novel's characters - this is far more insightful and realistic than most novels about contemporary relationships, and funnier and more compelling as a result.

This is especially true in the descriptions of sex - for all the inventiveness and sexual exploration, Politics rings far truer than the sex scenes in most novels. It acknowledges the fact that sex isn't athletic and flawless, but often awkward and clumsy and distracted; that it's not always about lust, but also about trying to make other people happy or conforming to imagined social pressure.