Product Details
Verbatim 43533 DVD-R 4.7GB 16x Printable 50 Pack Spindle

Verbatim 43533 DVD-R 4.7GB 16x Printable 50 Pack Spindle
From Verbatim

List Price: £19.58
Price: £12.72 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Delivery on orders over £5. Details

Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk

27 new or used available from £9.18

Average customer review:

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #1041 in Consumer Electronics
  • Brand: Verbatim
  • Model: 43533
  • Released on: 2006-07-12
  • Dimensions: .39" h x .39" w x .39" l, 2.20 pounds

Editorial Reviews

Manufacturer's Description
Photo Printable DVD's offer a fully printable surface allowing users to print their own design onto the actual disc surface using a compatible Inkjet printer.


Customer Reviews

WOW !5
Considering I paid £12.99 for a 25 pack of the same discs from WHSmith, this 50 pack is remarkable value. I've tried several printable discs from other manufactures in the past, but I feel that these Verbatim discs are by far the best. Unlike some they actually burn at 16x and are easily printable giving you a smooth crisp disc every time. Highly recommended.

Be aware this is photo (i.e. inkjet ) printable only5
The DVDs are good (Verbatim's always are - I don't buy anything else).

The main reason for this feedback is to let new buyers of printable DVDs know that there are two types: photo (i.e. inkjet) printable and thermal printable. You cannot print photo printable with a thermal printer or vice versa. I'm dumb and didn't know this ...

These DVDs are just described as printable. FYI - they are photo printable - you can't print them with a thermal printer.

excellent value and quality5
I recently bought a spindle of 50 of these DVDs and have used about half of them and not one has failed so far. Unless all the dodgy ones are clumped together at the bottom of the spindle they would seem to be as good as it gets at a very good price. I have used Verbatim CDs and DVDs for quite some time and have not had any problems with them. Maybe the reviewer with the high failure rate should look at his hardware as another reviewer suggested.