The Case for God: What Religion Really Means
|
| List Price: | £20.00 |
| Price: | £9.00 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Delivery on orders over £5. Details |
Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk
26 new or used available from £7.99
Average customer review:Product Description
The enormous popularity of books by Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris and others shows that despite the religious revival that is under way in many parts of the world, there is widespread confusion about the nature of religious truth. For the first time in history, a significantly large number of people want nothing to do with God. In the past people went to great lengths to experience a sacred reality that they called God, Brahman, Nirvana or Dao; indeed religion could be said to be the distinguishing characteristic of homo sapiens. But now militant atheists preach a gospel of godlessness with the zeal of Christian missionaries in the age of faith and find an eager audience. What has happened? Karen Armstrong argues that historically atheism has rarely been a denial of the sacred itself but has nearly always rejected a particular conception of God. During the modern period, the Christians of the West developed a theology that was radically different from that of the pre-modern age. Tracing the history of faith from the Palaeolithic Age to the present, Armstrong shows that until recently there was no warfare between science and religion. But science has changed the conversation. The meaning of words such as belief, faith, and mystery has been entirely altered, so that atheists and theists alike now think and speak about God - and, indeed, reason itself - in a way that our ancestors would have found astonishing. Why has the modern God become incredible? Has God a future in this age of aggressive scientific rationalism? Karen Armstrong suggests that if we draw creatively on the insights of the past, we can build a faith that speaks to the needs of our troubled and dangerously polarized world.
Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #2064 in Books
- Published on: 2009-07-02
- Original language: English
- Binding: Hardcover
- 384 pages
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Karen Armstrong is one of the world's leading commentators on religious affairs. She spent seven years as a Roman Catholic nun in the 1960s, but then left her teaching order in 1969 to read English at St Anne's College, Oxford. In 1982, she became a full time writer and broadcaster. She is a best-selling author of over 15 books. An accomplished writer and passionate campaigner for religious liberty, Armstrong has addressed members of the United States Congress and the Senate and has participated in the World Economic Forum.
Customer Reviews
The answer is, there are no answers
A brilliantly refreshing, readable and clear run-through of the history of religion and mysticism, mostly Christianity, and looking more at the writings of scholars rather than the experience of the laity. Armstrong doesn't really make a case for God (as in the existence of God) but rather a case for the argument that we cannot know anything about God. She clearly explains why any attempt to understand God intellectually, or to define "him", is pointless and tends to lead to idolatry. Her argument is that seeking to define the nature of God is largely a product of the scientific age, but her evidence for a more uncertain approach to God being typical previously comes from the writings of certain Greek and early Christian mystics, which she paints as typical of their times, rather than unusual - something I'm not in a position to verify.
Importantly, she argues that religion is a matter of practice not "belief" (a word that now means an acceptance of something as fact, but which in the past had the connotation more of commitment, like love), and that where it is entered into, it is best done with the understanding that it is not based on any knowledge of God's nature.
This book could be seen as an argument for mysticism, but there is no attempt at conversion here. The book doesn't itself suggest why someone not already on a religious path should follow one. Religious practice might be rewarding, but no one could be expected to know that until they were well on it, after much hard work they could otherwise have avoided. My reading of the book is that those disposed to religious practice (by circumstances, upbringing or genetics) should follow the one that best suits them, but on the understanding that the choice of practice itself is of little consequence, as long as it is entered into without any belief in its factual superiority. Meanwhile, those not so disposed to do so, should not be expected to. In the end, it is an erudite plea for a greater acceptance of the state of Unknowing. Whether such a plea will find many listeners in an age where factual knowledge and certainty are held in such high regard remains to be seen.
Recommended read.
Having bought and read six of Karen's books I found this to be one of her best. With over a thousand noted references and ten pages of glossary I am sure that I shall be returning to this book time and again for information. On a couple of occasions during the book Karen acknowledges God and religion are difficult issues to write about. Readers have even given her feedback that some of her work in the past has been difficult to read. Well despite the difficulty of the subjects and the huge amount of information there is to draw on, this book is not difficult. It does however deserve concentrated thought if you wish to get the best out of it, as she skilfully charts the development and interpretations of God and religion since 30,000 BCE. Having read hundreds of books on the subjects I have at times become very confused. This book has been like a breath of fresh air in gently helping me unravel some of those puzzling issues. I have no hesitation in recommending the book - enjoy it.
Brilliant book
This is a book that should be widely read. Although it continues the argument from Armstrong's previous books like 'a History of God' and 'The Great Tranformation' you can read it even if you are unfamilier with her work. The basic argument is that we have lost our sense of the importance of the mythological and use of symbolism within society and this effects our understanding of religion. As a Priest in the Church of England I think all my collegues should read it, and in my own congregation I have a number of people who are about to read it, and have been influenced by her work in the past. Armstrong is a prolific writer, and if you have not read her books before get this one and no doubt you will then want to read some of her other work. I particulaly liked the part where we are reminded of Paul Tillich's important work, which seems to have been lost in recent times. I could write more, but the best thing I can say is go and read it with an open mind.



