Product Details
Wonderful Life: Burgess Shale and the Nature of History

Wonderful Life: Burgess Shale and the Nature of History
By Stephen Jay Gould

List Price: £10.99
Price: £7.14 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Delivery. Details

Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk

16 new or used available from £4.26

Average customer review:

Product Description

Centres on a sensational discovery in the field of palaeontology - the existence in the Burgess Shale of 530-million-year-old-fossils, unique in age, preservation and diversity.


Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #50522 in Books
  • Published on: 2000-08-03
  • Original language: English
  • Binding: Paperback
  • 352 pages

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.co.uk Review
The Burgess Shale of British Columbia "is the most precious and important of all fossil localities", writes Stephen Jay Gould. These 600-million-year-old rocks preserve the soft parts of a collection of animals unlike any other. Just how unlike is the subject of Gould's book.

Gould describes how the Burgess Shale fauna was discovered, reassembled and analysed in detail so clear that the reader actually gets some feeling for what paleobiologists do, in the field and in the lab. The many line drawings are unusually beautiful, and now can be compared to a wonderful collection of photographs in Fossils of the Burgess Shale by Derek Briggs, one of Gould's students.

Burgess Shale animals have been called "a palaeontological Rorschach test", and not every geologist by any means agrees with Gould's thesis that they represent a "road not taken" in the history of life. Simon Conway Morris, one of the subjects of Wonderful Life, has expressed his disagreement in Crucible of Creation. Wonderful Life was published in 1989, and there has been an explosion of scientific interest in the pre-Cambrian and Cambrian periods, with radical new ideas fighting for dominance. But even though many scientists disagree with Gould about the radical oddity of the Burgess Shale animals, his argument that the history of life is profoundly contingent--as in the movie It's a Wonderful Life, from which this book takes its title--has become more accepted, in theories such as Ward and Brownlee's Rare Earth hypothesis. And Gould's loving, detailed exposition of the labour it took to understand the Burgess Shale remains one of the best explanations of scientific work around. --Mary Ellen Curtin


Customer Reviews

Fascinating and thought-provoking5
This fascinating and thought-provoking book has two main stands; a description and (controversial) interpretation of some surprising fossils from the earliest period of multicellular animals, and an appeal to overturn the idea of evolution as a "cone of increasing diversity". Instead, Gould argues, evolution should be thought of as a "copiously branching bush".

All the while, he provides insights into what it is paleontologists actually *do*, and how theories about life and evolution develop and change over time.

Well, maybe but I'm not convinced2
Gould writes beautifully. His style is impeccable. He also writes very clearly. The problem is what he writes.I did enjoy this book, but the arguments Gould uses to make his case for the Pre-Cambrian explosion of life-forms seems a little rushed. In the beauty of his prose it is easy to go along with generalisations that aren't actually valid. Dawkins gives a good illustration of this in Unweaving The Rainbow. Modern evolutionary theorists almost uniformly disagree with Gould's perspective, and if you don't get too carried away with his eloquence you can see why.

Worth buying for the writing alone, but cynicism is a must at all times.

Yes, Wonderful5
Anyone who thinks they "know" the basic story of evolution from should read this and be challenged. The book is a discourse on evolution and a fascinating narrative of scientific discovery, but I think that the most important thing about the book is Gould's central point that our preconceived notions about science, humanity and society cause us to draw wrong conclusions from new information because we tend to "shoehorn" new discoveries into the framework of our old ideas, instead of allowing new discoveries to challenge them. Makes you question your own thought processes....