Product Description

Mass-market edition of the first authoritative single-volume biography of John F. Kennedy to be written in nearly four decades. Drawing upon first-hand sources and never-before-opened archives, prize-winning historian Robert Dallek reveals more than we ever knew about Jack Kennedy, forever changing the way we think about his life, his presidency and his legacy. Dallek also discloses that, while labouring to present an image of robust good health, Kennedy was secretly in and out of hospitals throughout his life, soill that he was administered last rites on several occasions. He never shies away from Kennedy's weaknesses, but also brilliantly explores his strengths. The result is a full portrait of a bold, brave and truly human John F. Kennedy.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #56458 in Books
• Published on: 2004-07-01
• Original language: English
• Binding: Paperback
• 848 pages

About the Author
Robert Dallek has taught at Columbia, UCLA, and Oxford. He is currently a professor of history at Boston University. He is the author of several books, including his classic two-volume biography of Lyndon Johnson, Lone Star Rising and Flawed Giant. He has won the Bancroft Prize for American history, among numerous other awards for scholarship and teaching.

Customer Reviews

Excellent conspiracy free account of JFK
Robert Dallek gets the formula right in an excellent biography of JFK. This book concentrates on JFK's life and deliberately avoids controversy about who shot him and all the conspiracy theories that have arisen since November 22nd 1963.

Like millions of others, I remember the day well that JFK was assassinated. I was only four years old at the time, but the memory of "a bad man" coming out of the clouds to get him still lingers to this day. I have had a fascination about JFK and what he could have achieved. I have visited the 6th Floor museum in Dallas, collect US coins with his portrait, and now I have read a brilliant biography of him.

The book largely concludes that JFK had a mostly uneventful life as a Senator and that his Presidency was all to short to really describe him as a great President. However, his role in the Cuban missile crisis where he played brinkmanship with Kruschev is brilliantly described - we can all be thankful that he was a powerful diplomat who saw military action as a last straw.

Vietnam, Berlin, Bay of Pigs, Civil Rights - they all described magnificently. Once criticism that I would have it that the author states that he was able to use new information in this biography not found in others from material released by Russian government in particular. It would have been useful to know which pieces of information are new.

JFK's early life gets a lot of detail - one wonders what he would have done if his brother Joe had survived the war. In fact, JFK's unfinished life asks a lot of "What ifs?"

What if he had been exposed in the press as a womanizer of libidinous proportions?

What if Kruschev called his bluff over Cuban missiles?

What if he lived to get elected to a second term?

Those looking for gory details about the assassination and answers to "Who shot JFK" will be disappointed - this is not the thrust of this book.

Read it and enjoy.

An Admirable, Balanced Examination of JFK
The fall of the Soviet Union and the resulting availability of Soviet archives to researchers have brought about several new studies of the cold war and its leading figures. This book is an excellent example of the new insights to be gained by a more through understanding of what the Soviet leadership, in this case Khrushchev and company, were thinking. For a biography like this however, new Soviet material, while important, is not enough. Any author who chooses to write about JFK must not only deal with the cold war, but also civil rights, Lyndon Johnson, Boston politics, George Wallace, Joseph Kennedy, Sr., and even Richard Nixon. Robert Dallek has done a wonderful job of sorting through tons of material on the above subjects and much more to bring the Kennedy brothers and their era to life. I say the Kennedy brothers because no study of JFK could possibly be complete without a close look at his brothers.

At first Jack's life is dominated by competition with his elder brother Joe, Jr. At home, in school, and in the military Jack was expected to live up to his brother's example. A task the future President was not up to. The strong and healthy Joe, Jr. always seemed to be better than Jack at most everything and their father actually seems to have been angry with Jack when he got sick. Dallek points out over and over that Joe and Rose Kennedy were not ideal parents. After Joe, Jr. was killed in WWII Jack became the heir apparent to his father's political ambitions for his eldest son. It was during one of his early campaigns that Jack grew close to Bobby.

Bobby Kennedy does not come off well in this book. He appears to be a spoiled, ill tempered, bully who yells at anyone who doesn't agree with him. Given his later stands it is amazing to see RFK as far more belligerent toward the USSR than his brother. In fact, at one point during an international crisis the author states that the U.S. and the world were lucky that JFK was president instead of RFK. Still, it is obvious that President Kennedy put much faith in his brother and often used him as the bad guy. Jack himself did not take criticism or opposition well; often referring to any whom opposed his view as a SOB. But still, he was a much better sport than Bobby was.

Dallek has put together a highly readable and well-researched volume. He is clearly impressed by his subject but does not hesitate to point out Jack's failures, and there were several. JFK was in fact much more interested in foreign policy than domestic policy and seems to have been very much led in his decisions by polls. He really did not become much of a leader in either category until the Cuban missile crisis, which seems to have given him more confidence. He never really, for example, offered any leadership on civil rights until 1963 and even then the rich boy from New England never really could understand the dynamics in play. He had never really been around blacks and had problems relating to them, while at the same time never grasping the attitudes of white southerners. Worse, since Bobby couldn't stand LBJ, Kennedy never really used his Vice-President much, even though as a southerner Johnson was very familiar with the problems. Dallek has not pulled any punches and his criticism of Kennedy's civil rights record shows it as does his detailing of Jack's health problems and womanizing.

I enjoyed this book thoroughly and after seeing the changes in Kennedy after October 1962 I can't help wonder: what if? Unfortunately, the same question apparently occurred to Dallek who ends his book by trying to assess how successful JFK might have been in a second term. As I said before, Dallek deserves high praise for his objectivity through out the rest of this book, but at the end his objectivity falters. The book ends basically assuming that Congress would have passed all of Kennedy's second term proposals, Castro would have become the best friend America ever had, the Vietnam war would have just gone away, and the Soviets would have behaved admirably. While all of this is possible, it is not likely and the credibility of the whole book suffers as Dallek himself falls victim to the very Kennedy aura he has been trying to explain.

An Unfinished Life
This is a rather dry and academic account of JFK's life. There are a few passages and parts of chapters that are genuinely exciting and fascinating to read (the Cuban missile crisis being one of them) but generally this book goes into too great a depth of information about things that you don't want to know that much about. This is a good read to learn about JFK's politics, but useless to learn about the man. It barely mentions his children and his relationship with his wife is only written about in relation to his womanising (which again isn't explored too much) or her dislike of white house life. I felt like I came away knowing a great deal about his political life and policy decisions, but sadly lacking any real insight into his character. Although this aspect was mentioned at times and especially in the first part of the book, it wasn't to any degree that you feel you know what motivated him and it was written in a very dry way. Worth a read if part of an overall study of the man, but look elsewhere for a more rounded biography.