Product Description

This text offers a reading of the story of Eden that seeks to open up a new understanding of the history of our relationship with, and attitudes to, nature. The book shows how the contradictions in the relationship of the human and the natural define the central controversy of ecology: the conflict between the deep ecologists, who dream of returning to Eden, restoring a state of harmony in which wilderness reclaims the Earth; and the managers, who dream of a man-made paradise, one that presumes a harmony between the best interests of humans and their planet.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #1011683 in Books
• Published on: 2000-06-09
• Original language: English
• Binding: Paperback
• 624 pages

Amazon.co.uk Review
Many nature writers choose humanity's relationship to wildness as their topic. Evan Eisenberg examines the question with an eye toward Eden, "the wild place at the center of the world from which all blessings flow."

Humans left Eden; indeed, having left "Eden" is a defining myth in almost all human cultures. Eisenberg identifies three basic before-the-fall dreams: Eden, a paradise in space and time; Arcadia, the perfect pastoral blend of city conveniences and wilderness beauty; and the Golden Age, a time when things were really good. Humans almost universally think that sometime "before" or in some "other place", we (and all other species) lived in harmony and balance. Through examples ranging from cyanobacteria poisoning the early atmosphere with oxygen to ants raising aphids like cattle, Eisenberg reveals the fallacy of this notion. What humans have done that's different from previous world changers is allied ourselves with the annual grasses--quickly using up half a billion years of soil formation. With our crops, pets and viruses we've nullified continental ecological boundaries. The globe has been remade before, but not this fast or this far. We'll probably have to scale back our influence--the question is how and how much. This is where humanity's environmental battles will be fought in the future. Eisenberg trips up a bit in lumping environmentalists into two camps: planet managers (conservationists) and planet fetishists (preservationists), but he definitely sees the key ecological issues facing our civilization.

This is a witty, charming, and well-referenced book, full of scary environmental facts and comforting ecological truths. His conclusions are not new--that humans need thriving cities, not sprawling suburbs, to avoid overwhelming the wilderness that's left. But Eisenberg's insight into how we can be at peace with our world is valuable advice, if we could stop dreaming and heed it. --Therese Littleton