Product Details
Ambivalent Conquests: Maya and Spaniard in Yucatan, 15171570: Maya and Spaniard in Yucatan, 1517-1570 (Cambridge Latin American Studies)

Ambivalent Conquests: Maya and Spaniard in Yucatan, 15171570: Maya and Spaniard in Yucatan, 1517-1570 (Cambridge Latin American Studies)
By Inga Clendinnen

List Price: £16.99
Price: £16.14 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Delivery on orders over £5. Details

Availability: Usually dispatched within 1 to 3 weeks
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk

38 new or used available from £7.45

Product Description

This is both a specific study of conversion in a corner of the Spanish Empire, and a work with implications for the understanding of European domination and native resistance throughout the colonial world. Dr Clendinnen explores the intensifying conflict between competing and increasingly divergent Spanish visions of Yucatan and its destructive outcomes. She seeks to penetrate the ways of thinking and feeling of the Mayan Indians in a detailed reconstruction of their assessment of the intruders.


Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #44735 in Books
  • Published on: 2003-04-28
  • Original language: English
  • Number of items: 1
  • Binding: Paperback
  • 264 pages

Editorial Reviews

Review
‘Ambivalent Conquests sets a high standard of elegance in style and argument.’ Nancy Farriss, Hispanic American Historical Review

‘This is a splendid book by a gifted historian.’ Steve J. Stern, American Historical Review

‘This is an intricate story, by turns exhilarating and depressing, of cultural interaction among parties whose motives were consciously and unconsciously at variance. . . . Clendinnen's reconstruction is a model of historical intelligence and anthropological empathy couched in superbly crafted prose." Frederick P. Bowser, Latin American Research Review

‘[Clendinnen’s] analysis of the symbolic forms of everyday life sheds new light on the relationship between the ‘social’ and the ‘sacred’.’ Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

‘A worthwhile contribution.’ Matthew Restall, UCLA Historical Journal