The Large, the Small and the Human Mind (Canto)
|
| Price: | £13.99 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Delivery on orders over £5. Details |
Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk
37 new or used available from £3.00
Average customer review:Product Description
Roger Penrose’s original and provocative ideas about the large-scale physics of the Universe, the small-scale world of quantum physics and the physics of the mind have been the subject of controversy and discussion. These ideas were proposed in his best-selling books The Emperor’s New Mind and Shadows of the Mind. In this book, he summarises and updates his current thinking in these complex areas to present a masterful summary of those areas of physics in which he feels there are major unresolved problems. Through this, he introduces radically new concepts which he believes will be fruitful in understanding the workings of the brain and the nature of the human mind. These ideas are challenged by three distinguished experts from different backgrounds: Abner Shimony and Nancy Cartwright as philosophers of science and Stephen Hawking as a theoretical physicist and cosmologist. Roger Penrose concludes with a response to their thought-provoking criticisms.
Product Details
- Amazon Sales Rank: #114438 in Books
- Published on: 2000-04-28
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Binding: Paperback
- 201 pages
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.co.uk Review
Will quantum physics let us reduce consciousness to computation? Roger Penrose says "no" with great force and eloquence in The Large, The Small, and the Human Mind. Originally prepared as a series of three lectures in Cambridge's Tanner Series on Human Values, the material is both meticulously thought out and informally presented, including many illustrations by Penrose and others. For publication, the author sought out rebuttals and commentary by philosophers Abner Shimony and Nancy Cartwright as well as his own colleague and occasional rival, the well-known theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking, then reserves the last word for himself, as is his prerogative. The result is a sharp but polite argument on the nature of thinking and its reducibility; readers familiar with The Emperor's New Mind and Shadow of the Mind will find the arguments from quantum physics fleshed out in greater detail but also attacked with good-natured aplomb. Those who missed out on Penrose's older forays into this territory (or are somehow disinterested in the nature of thought) will find this an excellent, if broad, overview of the modern conception of physics from subatomic shenanigans to the radius of the universe as well as a stimulating debate among several great modern thinkers. Despite Penrose's certainty that our brains can't be modelled by computational systems--and hence that strong artificial intelligence will remain in science fiction--the argument continues, and will continue for some time. The Large, The Small, and the Human Mind crystallises that debate for readers who want to keep up with the latest thinking about thinking. --Rob Lightner
Review
‘To see a scientist of Penrose’s ability, stature and achievement toss large parts of modern physics into the air as though juggling balls and try to keep them aloft while marshalling them into a coherent pattern is a thing to behold. It is a wonderful illustration of a first-rate scientist doing what first-rate scientists have always done: make bold conjectures and display them for others to confirm, refute or amend.’ Keith Devlin, New Scientist
‘When Oxford physicist and mathematician Penrose … has something to say about general relativity, quantum physics and artificial intelligence, we would do well to listen.’ Publishers Weekly
‘The book is an attractive and stimulating introduction to some fascinating issues, on some of which (such as the intelligibility of the universe) theists would certainly be able to offer some alternative insights.’ John Polkinghorne, Science and Christian Belief
‘... one could hardly ask for a shrewder or more enthusiastic tour guide to the extremes of physics.’ Scientific American
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
‘… a stimulating and compact review of Penrose’s own thinking.’ Bernard Dixon, The Independent
Customer Reviews
The clearest statement of Penrose's philosophy to date.
A previous commentator claimed that this book was not readable enough for a mass audience--I have to disagree with this view wholeheartedly. I would say that his previous works, especially "Shadows of the Minds" were difficult to digest due to the amount of mathematics contained in almost all of the chapters (this doesn't negate the power of his ideas--he just makes them hard to understand). This latest work presents all of his major ideas on cosmology, quantum physics, and the nature of the mind in an extremely clear manner. His treatment of quantum physics is the best I've seen to date in a popular work. A short and rewarding read.
Hard to follow, not for the Layperson.
I was disappointed with this book, I found the arguments both overly convoluted and often assumed the reader was familiar with physics graduate level concepts.
Typically good and heuristic Penrose
My one line summary is praise enough, but I will say that one of your reviewers appears to be miffed because a particular paragraph appeared to be arcane. I had expected, then, to read something about, say, Penrose's writing style. How could I have had such an expectation when that reviewer writes, ". . . there are a number . . ." There are a man who should read books on different topics. There are a man who should buy a book on grammar. There are no chance that he will do so!



