Product Description

Ever since Geoffrey of Monmouth in the twelfth century there has been an effort to show that the Arthur of Celtic legend was based on an historical figure. In this re-examination of all the early literature Thomas Green argues that all such attempts involve special pleading. Thus, far from being an historical figure mythicized, Arthur emerges as a mythical and/or folkloric figure historicized. The evidence reveals that he was essentially the defender of Britain from all threats, with an intimate connection with the Underworld. Looking at the latest research into Celtic and Indo-European deities, the author concludes with the suggestion that Arthur may well have been a local deity, the product of a pre-Christian mythology. This is essential reading for anyone with an interest in Arthur.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #190860 in Books
• Published on: 2008-01-24
• Original language: English
• Binding: Paperback
• 288 pages

Review
Valuable to anyone studying the Arthurian legend... vigorous and comprehensive --Speculum, the Journal of the Medieval Academy of America

Concepts of Arthur is that rare thing: a book that offers an original and refocused view of the nature of Arthur --Arthuriana, the Journal of Arthurian Studies

'Concepts of Arthur' is an inspiring read which does not disappoint those who want a satisfying contextualising of disparate evidence.
--Pendragon, the Journal of the Pendragon Society

About the Author
Thomas Green is a post-graduate researcher at the University of Oxford and a part-time history teacher.He lives in Louth, Lincolnshire.This is his first book.

Customer Reviews

Let's just hope he's wrong!
This excellent, academic work left me feeling rather sad. It is an in-depth look at Arthur as a purely folkloric, topographic character or even minor deity. Green's arguments, methodology and references to others work on the subject are first class and his arguments compelling.

What made me sad was the thought that, having read just about every piece of Arthurian literature in search of the historical figure behind the legendary Arthur, he may never had been one. He may simply have been a mythical figure who became historicized in the 9th century before being turned into a legend.

I would recommend everyone seriously interested in this subject to buy this work, along with N J Higham's Arthurian book. If, after reading these, you still think there was a human figure behind this legendary monarch, then read other works. This is definitely not for those who `believe' in a historical Arthur.

King Arthur all smoke, no fire
One of Britain's leading experts on Arthuriana, Tom Green has written the definitive study on the fact and fiction of the legendary Dark Age monarch in Concepts of Arthur. He brings together an overwhelming mass of evidence from primary sources and contemporary scholars that examines, and for my money, conclusively answers The Big Arthur Question: was Arthur an historical figure later enlarged into fiction, or a fictional Celtic folk hero later endowed with an historical existence owing to the almost total lack of actual historical detail from the 500-600 AD period. Green's research is refreshingly free from the shameless subjectivity that has plagued so many writers on this topic, from the ardent but inadequate amateur, to the supposedly professional academic. Green simply looks for evidence to answer the question, he does not clutch at non-existent straws hoping to prove the existence of the historical Arthur every English Romantic desperately wants and needs there to be. In particular, Green examines the rich heritage of Arthur in Celtic legend and the part it played in creating the Arthur we know today. Written in a crisp, spare style pleasingly free of Academic verbosity, this book is a must-have for anyone who has ever felt an interest in the "one true King" of Dark Age Britain.