Product Description

In a sequence of landmark decisions in the 1990s, from Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale to Klienwort Benson v Lincoln City Council, the House of Lords and courts throughout the common law world have recognised and developed a coherent law of restitution based upon the principle of reversing unjust enrichment. This intellectual revolution supersedes obsolete learning on quasi-contract and constructive trusts. Whenever money goes astray, or an apparently consensual transaction goes awry, lawyers need to be familiar with the principles and detailed rules of this "new" subject. This work addresses the relationship between the unjust enrichment principle and the traditional rules on transactions and insists upon the primacy of contract and the subsidiarity of restitution to established categories of law. The book guides both the student and the busy practitioner through the difficult practical issues and the arcane vocabulary towards a clearer understanding of the restitutionary enquiry. It also includes guidance on the relevant practice and drafting the statements of case.

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #1731755 in Books
• Published on: 2000-05-31
• Original language: English
• Binding: Paperback
• 552 pages

About the Author
Gerard McMeel is a Professor of Law at the University of Bristol, where he teaches and researches in the areas of contract, restitution and commercial law. He also practises as a barrister from Guildhall Chambers. He is the author of Casebook on Restitution.

Customer Reviews

The best modern account of the law
This is a first-rate textbook. Building on the foundations built by Goff & Jones and Professor Birks, McMeel manages to make sense of this dynamic and fast-moving subject. The coherent analysis of the modern law is coupled with intelligent suggestions for reform. The book is extremely accessible (much more so than Virgo's Principles of the Law of Restitution) and is essential reading for any student of this difficult subject.