Product Details
Blind Chance [DVD] [1981]

Blind Chance [DVD] [1981]
Directed by Krzysztof Kieslowski

List Price: £19.99
Price: £5.58 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Delivery on orders over £5. Details

Availability: Usually dispatched within 24 hours
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk

14 new or used available from £3.14

Average customer review:

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #20754 in DVD
  • Released on: 2003-10-27
  • Rating: Suitable for 18 years and over
  • Formats: PAL, Widescreen
  • Original language: Polish
  • Subtitled in: English
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Running time: 124 minutes

Editorial Reviews

DVD Description
Poland, in the politically turbulent late 1970s: Witek is running to catch a train. From this banal event, Krzysztof Kieslowski, the director of Dekalog and the Three Colours trilogy, imagines three different possible outcomes in the young man’s life. In the first scenario, Witek catches the train, on which he meets some hard line Communists and joins the party. In the second, as Witek runs for the train, his path is blocked by a ticket inspector; the ensuing struggle leads to his arrest and subsequent involvement in the political underground. In the final scenario, Witek misses the train and he returns to the medical studies that he intended to abandon. He falls in love with a female student, gets married and lives a quiet life as a doctor, showing little interest in politics.

Special Features

  • Interview with Kieslowski collaborator Annette Insdorf
  • Interview with filmmaker Agnieska Holland
  • Workshop Exercises - short film by Marcel Lonzinski
  • Kieslowski filmography

  • Language: Polish
  • Subtitles: English
  • Audio: Dolby Digital 2.0
  • Colour
  • Enhanced for widescreen TVs
  • Region Code: 2
  • Running Time: 124 minutes

Synopsis
In 1970s Poland, BLIND CHANCE comprises the same simple story (a man runs to catch train) but one that is played out with three different outcomes. In the first scenario Witek catches the train and subsequently becomes involved in the hard line communist party. In the second scenario his path to the train is blocked by an officious ticket collector; they struggle and the man is arrested, leading to the start of his involvement with the underground. In the third scenario, the man misses the train and goes back to the studies he was going to leave. He meets and falls in love with a female student and they subsequently marry. He goes on to lead a quiet life as a doctor with little time for the political upheaval going on around him.


Customer Reviews

Life does not follow a timetable or run on straight lines5
Shot in 1981, this influential film by Krzysztof Kieslowski was subjected to years of censorship by the Polish authorities and did not become public property until the Cannes Film Festival in 1987. Kieslowski explores the role of chance, how seemingly innocuous decisions or events can change our lives. Witek is a fundamentally decent young man, studying medicine, who runs to catch a train. It seems as if his career and his future depend on him boarding the train, but Kieslowski replays the scenario three times. On each occasion, Witek experiences a different future: whether he catches the train or not, a different set of circumstances becomes a possibility and his fate is left in the hands of blind chance.

We are shown three possible futures for Witek - as Communist Party functionary, as Christian and political radical, or as an apolitical family man, content in his role as a doctor. Each of his options provides a commentary on the politics of Poland in the 1980's, most significantly in its reflection on the role of censorship and how ideas can shape our understanding of the world (and of ourselves).

Poland, of course, was rent with changes in the 1980's - as was the entire Soviet bloc. Where would it go as a nation, as a political entity? Kieslowski and his contemporaries were brought up in Marxist dialectical materialism, suggesting that there was an inevitability to the emerge and dominance of the Communist Party. So what role is played by chance? If the plot to assassinate Hitler had succeeded in 1944, Poland might have been liberated by Western armies and politicians, not Soviet ones.

The life of a single individual can be as random as that of Witek: we are only shown one moment in his life from which dramatic changes are sparked - the implication is that there can be infinite possibilities within a lifespan (we are told, for instance, that Witek is a twin, but that he alone survived birth). If an individual's life is open to blind chance, surely there can be no certainties in history, no inevitability that the Communist Party, or the Catholic Church, should rule Poland.

Marxist philosophy emphasises the role of duality - classically described as 'thesis' and 'antithesis', opposing forces clashing to provide a third, dynamic force of 'synthesis'. By rejecting the notion of duality, by emphasising that Witek has three possibilities, not two, Kieslowski is making a fundamental challenge to Communist doctrine. History is not predictable - it is random. Kieslowski would return to the theme of three choices in his "Three Colours" trilogy and in other areas of his work.

The film is firmly within the realist school of European film making - it is a fantasy about real life. The portrait he paints of his contemporary Poland is one stripped of glamour. This is a materially poor society, but one which is culturally and intellectually rich. People can make choices - they can uphold the State or they can oppose it ... or they can get on with their lives. What are the consequences of choice? What are the consequences of having no choice, of being simply the pawn of blind chance?

Kieslowski employs disorienting techniques - the camera takes the place of different characters during the production, putting you in the place of a number of the actors. How do we interpret the world? Are we just onlookers, or are we players? The director has the power to leave us as impassive members of the audience, or to elevate us to a temporary role as a participant in the film. Politicians have similar powers. And chance can strip us of self-determination and make us mere pawns.

A highly influential film, it is, perhaps, a slow starter. You do not really begin to engage with the characters until you appreciate that you are being shown the second of Witek's options; you do not really begin to understand the themes until you witness the third option and understand just how random chance can be. Kieslowski, himself, expressed dissatisfaction with the film, an opinion which defines his ability to be self-critical and to strive to push his art.

The extras provided on the DVD give valuable insight into his thinking, and into the role of the censor in political and artistic life, and make a significant contribution to your appreciation of the film. It's a film which can be viewed again and again: you lose nothing of your enjoyment in doing so - in fact a second or third viewing enhances your understanding, and will, perhaps, give you a taste for more of Kieslowski's work. A great European director, his films are essential (and thoroughly enjoyable) viewing for anyone with an interest in the cinema.

Przypadek (1981)5
Blind Chance is one of a number of early Kieslowski works released on DVD, and a film that deserves to be seen being an influence, both direct and indirect, to Sliding Doors (1998, it's referred to in the credits)& Run Lola Run (1999 respectively. It's the last of Kielowski's directly political works, a cycle that had run from the early documentaries and short films to full-length features The Scar and Camera Buff (both also issued).

Three-part episodic films have been a frequent mode in contemporary cinema (Mystery Train, Pulp Fiction, Run Lola Run), so Blind Chance can be seen as a major film from that angle. Kieslowski, writing on his own for the last time, offers three alternate stories based around Witek (Boguslaw Linda)catching a train. Variations on this theme occur- the first episode centres around joining the Communist party; the second sees him arrested, a path which leads to prison and becoming a militant political activist; and the third, sees him meet a female, settle down to a peaceful life of marriage, rejecting the world of politics and ends with an ironic twist of fate....

Kieslowski's film looks at chance and fate, themes that would recur in The Double Life of Veronique (the death, recurrence waiting for Veronique after Weronika dies)& Three Colours:Red (the way in which Valentine keeps missing her ideal lover, until fate conspires in another accident at the film's denoument). There are political elements here, notably in episodes 1 and 2, perhaps the third could be seen as a rejection of politics on Kieslowksi's part- as his work after shifted into an existential/philosophical mode that many found oblique. Blind Chance is very much a political film about Poland under Martial law, though despite the restrictions of the Communist rule- reflecting Kieslowksi's views regarding the effects of communism:

"Communism is like AIDS. That is, you have to die with it. You can't be cured. & that applies to anyone who's had anything to do with Communism regardless of what side they were on. It's irrelevant whether they were communists or anti-communists or entirely uncommited to either political side. It applies to everybody. If they've been exposed to the system as long as they have been in Poland- that is, for forty years- then Communism, its way of thinking, its way of life, its hierarchy of values, remains with them and there's no way of expelling it from their system...It stays inside. It exists, it remains and there's no way of getting rid of it. It doesn't particularly trouble me. I just know I've got it and know that I'll die with it, that's all. Not die of it, die with it. It only disappears when you disappear. The same as AIDS" (Kieslowski on Kieslowski, Faber)

Blind Chance is a brilliant film, in terms of style and technique it's intertesting; its political elements make it more so: a welcome issue on DVD and a reminder that Kieslowski was one of the great European auteurs.

THAT FILM IS A DYNAMITE !!!5
This is absolutely the best Kieslowski film, and maybe one of the best highly intelectual films ever made, at the same high level as Ingmar Bergman films. So it requires from you that you THINK while you watch it. Don't try to eat while watching it at least at the beginning, otherwise you may loose your appetite. Some scenes are very hard for the stomach. The film has an incredible strength, showing brutal and honest reality, and the whole philosophy, the plot showing life like IT IS in three different versions, not as it ought to be, is really explosive!!! No surprise that it was forbidden in comunist Poland in 1981. Though the film is not political, as some reviewers commented. It shows only what might happen to a young sensitive person trying to climb the career ladder in a communist party as an example. Replace it with any social climber or careerist getting involved in an institution abusing its power to oppress opponents and dissidents. The questions arising after watching this film are very universal: is it all a coincidence, a blind chance how Witek's life rolls or not? The final scene in the film (that with the airplane) is not refered to the last of the three possibilites Witek had (as some reviewer believed), but to all of them. Watch carefully the passangers waiting for the flight: there are all of them of the three stories flying to Paris!