Product Details
The Last Castle [DVD] [2002]

The Last Castle [DVD] [2002]
Directed by Rod Lurie

Price:

This item is not available for purchase from this store.
Click here to go to Amazon to see other purchasing options.


25 new or used available from £0.68

Average customer review:

Product Details

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #35197 in DVD
  • Released on: 2005-06-06
  • Rating: Suitable for 15 years and over
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Format: PAL
  • Original language: English
  • Number of discs: 1
  • Running time: 126 minutes

Editorial Reviews

Special Features
English
Region 2

Synopsis
Three-star General Irwin (Robert Redford) was a prisoner of war in Vietnam and a revered hero in the Persian Gulf and Bosnian campaigns. Now, he has been court-martialed for disobeying orders and he is sentenced to serve time at The Castle, a maximum-security military prison run by Colonel Winter (James Gandolfini), a hard-nosed disciplinarian. A battle of wills soon emerges between the two men, as The Castle's prisoners and guards find themselves drawn to Irwin's natural leadership abilities. As Irwin inspires the prisoners to find the dignity and pride that they have lost, he threatens Winter's strict regime, leading to a conflict that can only have one winner. From Rod Lurie, West Point graduate and director of DETERRENCE and THE CONTENDER, comes this intense dramatic thriller featuring battles both psychological and military. Stars Redford and Gandolfini, joined by gifted newcomers Mark Ruffalo and Clifton Collins, Jr., give excellent performances as a group of very different military men thrown together into an ugly situation. Filmed on location at the now-closed Tennessee State Penetentiary, THE LAST CASTLE is a hard-edged tribute to courage, honor, and loyalty.


Customer Reviews

My thought on The Last Castle4
Wow, what a brilliant film. An excellant plot, a good cast and very good acting from the crew. A prison uprising where the prisoners seize control - a bit over the top you might say? The idea is OTT but this film never lets that on. The acting is solid, and Mr. Redford delivers a good account of himself as the General. You really get into this film and share each loss and triumph. You really get behind every character. Then at the end, the shock twist (unless you're really clued in) will leave you thinking. A memorable film which you'll definately want to see again. My suggestion = buy it. You won't be disappointed.

The Last Castle3
"The Last Castle" tells the tale of a military prison into which disgraced 3-star General Eugene Irwin, played by Robert Redford, is sent after being convicted under Court Martial.

The prison is run under the iron fist of Col Winter (James Gandolfini) who runs the establishment like some sort of plaything; he has a vast collection of military memorabilia in his office, a huge library of military books and yet has never experienced active service. He calls the inmates "the enemy" and is convinced his men and himself operate "behind enemy lines" and is also extremely petty and pedantic about the following of minute rules and regulations.

Irwin on the other hand is the exact opposite. He is a scared and rugged leader with the battle stories to prove it. He leads by example, when punished by Winter to move a pile of rocks from one end of the exercise yard to the other, he completes the task in front of the other prisoners, sweating and straining and never complaining. Saluting isn't allowed in the prison but Irwin implements a system where the inmates will brush a hand through their hair at each other simulating a salute, nicknames are substituted for rank titles, and it is through such tricks as this that Irwin becomes the inmates' leader.

To cut a very long story short Irwin eventually leads the inmates in rebellion against the corrupt and unfair system that Winter is running. In quite a preposterous and yet extremely entertaining riot scene the "lunatics take over the asylum" and dethrone Winter from power. I still want to know how they hid the trebuchet!

There is a huge slice of "all-American" patriotism parp mixed up in it all with a real cheesy and almost sickening ending to do with the flag, but on the whole the film is extremely entreating and is never boring. Interestingly I read here that most other reviewers credit Redford's performance whereas I see it the other way around. Redford is good, make no mistake about that, but it is in Gandolfini's performance as the lisping and mean-streaked Winter that I think the plaudits should go to.

No contest as Robert Redford takes down James Gandolfini3
My thought is that James Gandolfini or any action on the face of the planet is not going to turn down an opportunity to act in a movie with Robert Redford, so that means the only reason question is why Redford signed up for this film. For that I have come up with two explanations. The first is that the victory of good men over the tyranny of an evil person in a position of power appeals to Redford's political sensibilities. The other is that "Brubaker" was a seminal experience in his film career and he wanted to try a prison picture from the other side of the bars. Take your pick or make up a reason of your own.

The film begins with a voice over narration by Redford enumerating the four key elements that define a castle. You are advised to pay attention to this list because these elements will come into play in the climax of the film where the metaphor of "The Last Castle" is exploited for everything it is worth. In one sense this is a fairly standard film where the hero is a prisoner who decides to take on the brutal prison warden. The fundamental twist is that it is a military prison, so Redford's character, Lieutenant General Eugene Irwin, has some dormant sensibilities that he can restore in the men. On the one hand the film avoids the cliche of Irwin being innocent; he freely admits he was guilty of the crime for which he is being punished (and while the crime is not exactly laid out completely later in the film there is enough of a hole in what we learn to continue thinking Irwin was, at least on some significant level, doing the "right" thing).

Gandolfini plays Colnel Winter, who Irwin correctly pegs on the basis of his collection of Civil War bullets as someone who has never been in combat. However, that proves to be the least of Winter's problems because the man has come up with his own ideas regarding how to manage brutal prisoners. At one point we find out Winter has been cleared in three investigations, which is the point at which I want to start banging my head against the wall at the idea that there is no difference between the men who run military prisons in the 21st century and those who worked the torture chambers of the Spanish Inquisition, not to mention the fact that the Judge Advocate's office of the U.S. Army is totally incompetent. Winters is stupid and predictable (sort of like this movie) and we know Irwin will take him down just as soon as he decides to wake up and smell the rubber bullets striking prisoners down at Winter's command.

The key to the film, which is clear pretty early on, is that Irwin is going to be one step ahead of Winter once he gets in gear and decides the prison commander needs to be removed from his post. After all, Irwin was a P.O.W. in North Vietnam, still baring the scars of his torture, so Winter and crew have a long way to go to give him a new experience in hell on earth. I think half way through the movie you know pretty much what is going to happen at the end and the only reason question are the specifics on how this will be accomplished (Director Rod Lurie gets credit for throwing a red herring at us that I thought was giving away too much of the ending).

David Scarpa's story/script is basically one of those works that echoes dozens of films, not just prison films in the tradition of "The Shawshank Redemption" but also other films from "The Bridge on the River Kwai" and "Monty Python and the Holy Grail." If you take "The Last Castle" as pure Hollywood escapism (i.e.., disengage brain and forget about the way the real world functions) you can enjoy it. The acting and direction are both competent, even if you are left with the definite impression that Redford is on auto-pilot and the fact that Gandolfini is not given all that much to do but look out a window and spout threats. As for the idea Redford is too old to be an action hero, I would not say carrying rocks around constitutes "action" per se.