Laurence J Brown's exciting first novel follows Ranulf Redbeard, one of Harold's crack Housecarls, in the dramas of 1066.

---

Product Description

1066: The storm clouds are gathering over England. Beyond the grey waters of the Channel, Duke William of Normandy, ambitious, ruthless, and seething with anger after having been cheated of the English Crown, prepares his great invasion fleet for the conquest of England.

Far to the north, Harald Hardraada, the warrior King of Norway also lays claim to the English Throne and begins to make his plans. Caught between the two, Harold Godwineson, the embattled English King, enlists the aid of his personal Champion Ranulf Redbeard to recruit men for his elite Housecarl regiment, the cream of the English army.

Then news arrives of Harold's betrayal by his brother, the treacherous Tostig Godwineson, and in the skies over England there appears a portent of doom. Torn by guilt and wracked by indecision Harold Godwineson has to make some difficult choices and before long the men of his Housecarl regiment are fighting for their very lives, bound by solemn blood-oaths to die on the field of battle for their King. Within the space of a month three great battles change the course of history as the land runs with blood...

---

Product Details

• Amazon Sales Rank: #193876 in Books
• Published on: 2001-06-08
• Binding: Paperback
• 298 pages

Style Magazine
Brings history to life as vividly as if you were watching a film...

Eastbourne & District Advertiser
…cleverly recalls a year in history when the land was awash with blood

Barry Spikings, Castle Rock Entertainment
…a great read…

---

Customer Reviews

Oh Dear!
What can I say! A good effort marred by inaccurate historic research.

Bishop Odo of Bayeax was Williams half brother, and not his cousin as stated! And the idea of a Knight Templar fighting at Senlac is quite ludicrous...there are other inaccuracies, quite a few in fact!

The writing style is quite basic but passable, and there are some good ideas and descriptions, if only the facts were better researched!

If you like a good old dark age 'beat em up' then this book is worth the read, but if you are a serious devotee of 1066 and all that, then you will be greatly disappointed.

Naively written but at times stirring
I think it's safe to say that research isn't this author's strong point. The hero fights a Knight Templar, a good half century before the order was founded (242). Ranulf's "bitter English ale" (168) anticipates the introduction of hops by some three and a half centuries. A latter-day druidess prescribes tansy "or to give it its Latin name Chrysanthemum vulgare. Do you speak Latin, Ranulf? [...] No, I suppose not" (80). Could "the bemused look on Ranulf's face" have something to do with the fact that Carl Linaeus wouldn't invent the name chrysanthemum, or binomial nomenclature, for another 700 years?
Although it's 400 years since they adopted Christianity, Brown's Saxons fluctuate inexplicably between monotheism and polytheism, sometimes in the same breath (34, 117). They're surprisingly adept at time-keeping though: "The sun rose at 6.48 am" (237). Harald Hardraada, historically a Christian, invokes Wodin (confusing the Old English and Norse names for that god). Harald talks about crossing the Poison Sea from Norway to England; the real Old Norse expression for this crossing was simply vestr um haf `west over the sea'. Perhaps he was thinking of the film The Vikings. Tostig, in fine Wagnerian fashion, wears an "eagle-winged helmet" (53), given him by the Danish king Sven Estridson--or Erithson, as Sven's matronymic is garbled to here. "Beowulf, the greatest Saxon of them all" (233) wasn't a Saxon but a Geat (a people of southern Sweden).
Biological curiosities abound too. Harold is endowed with a "penis and genitalia" (292). In Brown's world, men drown cursing with their lungs full of water, rather than passing out first due to asphyxiation from laryngospasm (116). Some are remarkably resilient to arterial bleeding: "Osmond saw a stream of blood pump from his thigh. How he still managed to stand Osmond could only wonder" (273); after six pages of this pumping "bright red" (268) blood--during which Guthrum has introspected at length, calculated when to attack, wandered out of the front line, taken a rest, moved in for the kill, struck a blow with his axe hefty enough to fell a horse, etc.--we can only wonder too. Throat-slitting is a reassuringly mild affair: "He sighed a gentle sigh" (164), as is the aftermath of battle: "It looked so peaceful now, in the moonlight, the thousands of fallen still and silent" (166). Compare this with John Prebble's description based on contemporary accounts of Culloden: "The nights of Wednesday and Thursday had been intensely cold, and many of the clansmen had been stripped of their clothes by the beggars who came out of the hills. Throughout the hours of darkness, the people of Culwhiniac, Urchil and Leanach heard the crying and the moaning from the field" (Culloden, 127).
In one particularly laughable subplot, we learn that poppy seeds (!) are a powerful "opiate" drug (99) whose physiological and moral effects mimic every stereotype known to late 20th century drugabuseology (81, 99, 120-2); they are an "addictive powder" (99), "self-inflicted abuse" of which leads to the inevitable hallucinatory flashbacks (120) and murder (122).
Of course, even in the Internet Age when checking such facts is a mouse-click away, a historical novel needn't be accurate history, or science, to work as fiction. Sadly the writing in Housecarl is as sloppy as the research. Grammatical slips arise from the author's attempt at formal register: "whom Ranulf guessed was at least six feet two [...]" (42); "who Tostig could just about recognise" (147). Figures of speech occur in contexts that make them absurd by highlighting the idiom's literal meaning: "striking distance" (272); "The Norman cavalry was beyond counting. Two thousand horse, he estimated; at least" (247). Sometimes it's the repetition of a word or idiom in close proximity that sticks out, suggesting a limited vocabulary: "the question was fired at her peremptorily [...] the questions were fired one after the other" (227-8); "the army that would sweep William the Bastard into the sea. The London road to Hastings swept south" (233); "and then it would become a slaughter [...] it was becoming a slaughter" (263-4); "Beside him a Saxon was cut down unmercilessly [sic.] as, weaponless he pleaded for mercy" (262-3).
Characterisation is simplistic: "He hated his brother with a blind, unreasoning hatred that consumed his soul" (52); in this case, it would seem, deliberately so (290). But the main historical players, Harold, Harald and William stand out against a backdrop of blander, invented characters.
The author isn't afraid of cliché: "call it a woman's intuition, call it sixth sense, she just knew" (186); "as though the weight of the world were on his shoulders" (196); "she was impossibly tall and slender, with graceful limbs like the branches of a willow" (222); "ocean of troubles" (232); "his face was a study of concentration (233).
There's much redundant verbiage: "By then a far greater, a cataclysmic horror would have occurred that would overshadow everything else in his life and haunt him for years to come. But that event had yet to occur; was still in the future" (188); "not one man [...] deluded himself that this was the end. On the contrary it was just about to begin" (254-5). Still, the narrative keeps up a fair pace, partly due to the plain style and paucity of incidental detail.
I found the battles vivid and exciting, and enjoyed the tension inherent in the main story. There are some other well imagined scenes too. I liked the Norman landings as seen by a little boy through fog, the lapwing fleeing before the volley of arrows, and the rousing heroic sentiment generally.

HOUSECARL Is A Riveting Tale of England 1064-1066!
This is another worthy story about Harold I & William of Normandy which will culminate into the Battle of Hastings, October 14, 1066. The characters are realistically portrayed, even the fictional ones, such as Ranulf Redbeard, personal champion and housecarl of King Harold. Several events led up to the inevitable historical battle of 1066 and the characters endure almost all of them.

King Harold is beset by dreams that would unfortunately come true. After being held prisoner by William in Normandy in 1064 for several months his only escape becomes coercion by William that he swears allegiance, on holy relics, to him especially when he comes to claim the English throne. As a short amount of time passes he is called to Edward the Confessor's deathbed and is bequeathed the throne.

He takes the throne uneasily knowing he has promised William his loyalty. This thought plagues him throughout his short reign. He is a king besieged by conscience and another major battle with Harald Hardraada, the warrior King of Norway. If Harold hadn't had to fight him and then accomplish a forced march back south to confront William, English history would have been forever changed.

This was a truly engaging story even though; I like many others know the tragic outcome. This novel was deserving of better editing, however, so there wouldn't have been glaring proofreading, grammatical and historical errors. I sincerely want to read more of this author's work without these types of errors. I highly recommend HOUSECARL.